In France, just as an example, it is quite usual for children to be given alcohol. I think that they should not be allowed alcohol until they are adults, and they can then make their own choice. If it was cigarettes,drugs or sex people would be be in a rage about it. Why the difference?
All in moderation. People will do as they please.
…when one in ten convicted child-abusers are women?
Does the Press have a feminine agenda, or do stereotypical demons sell papers?
Don’t feel bad. Most women do time for it as to where many men walk for the crime.
i’m also white.
i see mostly white killers on the tv..i dont mean to make this question sound racist
haley i said most serial killers are white.
nobody suspects the white man! bwahahahahaha!
But seriously, I don’t know. Maybe there’s some dna thing that makes their brains go haywire.I have noticed that mixed races seem more balanced than "pure" races. Maybe humans are like dogs…the purer the bloodline, the more problems they have.
I don’t believe in the death penalty at all, but I would be interested to see your responses 
.
If killing is considered such an evil act, then why perform that very same evil act and use the word ‘justice’ as excuse for such ill-behaviour?
Killing a person doesn’t undo his/her crime — it only makes you a killer too (so after that you’re not innocent anymore either).
What if the wrong person (innocent) is executed? Doesn’t that make anyone who was involved in the sentencing cold-blooded murderers? (i.e. judges, prosecutors, members of the jury, any member of society who gave the thumps up).
Should we consider them a bunch of thugs and should they all be executed too?
Prosecutors don’t seem to give a rat’s @ss if an accused is innocent or guilty. All they care about is big dollars and winning the case, which enhances their personal reputation and which in turn means more big dollars. They probably also get mighty adrenaline rushes from being regarded as some kind of hero by some members of society who also get great satisfaction from believing ‘justice is served’, meaning more motivation for winning the case.
Then there’s the issue of dealing with false accusations.
E.g. a relationship gone sour and a girl/woman who wants revenge cries rape!!!
Wouldn’t such false accusations then equate to MURDER if the accused is declared guilty, or ATTEMPTED murder if declared innocent?
Wouldn’t that mean that EVERY court case would end in either the accuser or the accused being executed?
And anyone who gives false evidence — should we then regard that as attempted murder?
Another point to ponder is, by executing a person, who are you REALLY hurting?
This act of revenge last only a moment for the convict, but the people who are REALLY hurting for a LONG, LONG time are the family members and close friends.
So again, you’re copying the same kind of ill-behaviour (i.e. hurting innocent victims).
And ironically, that is the reason (or excuse) behind your justification of the killing.
Personaly, I cannot see how any sane thinking person could get any kind of satisfaction out of that. But then again, people who are filled with hatred are in an ill-state of mind, not capable of thinking rationally.
I don’t believe in the death penalty at all, but I would be interested to see your responses .
If killing is considered such an evil act, then why perform that very same evil act and use the word ‘justice’ as excuse for such ill-behaviour?
Killing a person doesn’t undo his/her crime — it only makes you a killer too (so after that you’re not innocent anymore either).
What if the wrong person (innocent) is executed? Doesn’t that make anyone who was involved in the sentencing cold-blooded murderers? (i.e. judges, prosecutors, members of the jury, any member of society who gave the thumps up).
Should we consider them a bunch of thugs and should they all be executed too?
Prosecutors don’t seem to give a rat’s @ss if an accused is innocent or guilty. All they care about is big dollars and winning the case, which enhances their personal reputation and which in turn means more big dollars. They probably also get mighty adrenaline rushes from being regarded as some kind of hero by some members of society who also get great satisfaction from believing ‘justice is served’, meaning more motivation for winning the case.
Then there’s the issue of dealing with false accusations.
E.g. a relationship gone sour and a girl/woman who wants revenge cries rape!!!
Wouldn’t such false accusations then equate to MURDER if the accused is declared guilty, or ATTEMPTED murder if declared innocent?
Wouldn’t that mean that EVERY court case would end in either the accuser or the accused being executed?
And anyone who gives false evidence — should we then regard that as attempted murder?
Another point to ponder is, by executing a person, who are you REALLY hurting?
This act of revenge last only a moment for the convict, but the people who are REALLY hurting for a LONG, LONG time are the family members and close friends.
So again, you’re copying the same kind of ill-behaviour (i.e. hurting innocent victims).
And ironically, that is the reason (or excuse) behind your justification of the killing.
Personaly, I cannot see how any sane thinking person could get any kind of satisfaction out of that. But then again, people who are filled with hatred are in an ill-state of mind, not capable of thinking rationally.
place? Should people have psychological evaluations at a young age to identify people who a potential to be violent and intervene while they are still young? Should we come up with another option? Why or Why not?
Have parents that don’t abuse, mistreat, molest their kids, or expose them to family members that do.
I am working on a paper I’ve done some researching and cannot find any laws or cases where parents are considered as having committed child abuse if they let their children become obese. I just wanna double check that before I write a whole paper about how there should be a law for childhood obesity being a form of child abuse.
there should be.
Registries of Child Abuse and Neglect are confidential. Only people who are charged criminally have their names open to the public.
I noticed this suggestion recently on the internet.
With all these studies I keep seeing that say Prescription medications cause higher rates or suicideds and deeper depressions, I would say hell no. Parents who feed their children all these bs pills without ever looking to them are the real abusers.
I am doing a project in English for Dante’s Inferno. We have to make our own level of hell, Im doing child abusers. I have the three inner circles emotional, physical, and sexual. I have punishments for the others but I cant think of a punishment that would fit child sexual abusers…? Any ideas.
Child molesters would be surrounded by all the children they abused, hear them crying in their head for eternity, seeing how they turned out to be and hearing the kids tell them how messed up their life was after their trauma. It would drive them crazy until they were wishing they could die, and they wouldn’t. It’s a form of torture of the mind..